Head-to-Head

Two managers, one tactical matchup, ranked by fit.

MOCK DATA

Manager A

John Stegeman

Willem II

4-4-2

Manager B

Unai Emery

Aston Villa

4-4-2

🇳🇱

John Stegeman

Willem II

GafferScore

Current base shape

4-4-2

Age

—

Win % — club, league

—

Employed

🇪🇸

Unai Emery

Aston Villa

GafferScore

Current base shape

4-4-2

Age

Win % — club, league

52.1%

EmployedWWWLL

Tactical matchup

Mock data

John Stegeman

Willem II · 4-4-2

Unai Emery

Aston Villa · 4-4-2

CLEAR TACTICAL EDGE

Unai Emery

CLEAR TACTICAL EDGE

GafferLens model output: 62 – 38

Model output describing stylistic advantage — not a measured figure and not a win probability.

Confidence: Low

Limited directly comparable evidence — at least one manager is early into a spell, so the model leans on historical philosophy rather than current-club patterns.

Key battleground: Stegeman press vs Emery build-up
Biggest advantage: Unai Emery's high pressing intensity targets the first phase of John Stegeman's direct build-up that prioritises territory and second balls.
Biggest vulnerability: No obvious stylistic vulnerability in this matchup.

Why Unai Emery has the edge

Unai Emery's high pressing intensity targets the first phase of John Stegeman's direct build-up that prioritises territory and second balls.
Unai Emery's mixed build-up, baiting the press before switching is press-resistant against a low press.
Unai Emery's balanced tempo in a 3-2-5 shape sustains longer spells than John Stegeman's model allows.

How John Stegeman could respond

Bypass the first press earlier — more direct goalkeeper distribution and an extra body dropping beside the pivot, consistent with John Stegeman's existing direct build-up that prioritises territory and second balls.
Set sharper pressing triggers and accept a mid-block start rather than pressing the goalkeeper, which John Stegeman has used when the first line is played through.
Create a midfield box to match numbers centrally and switch play more aggressively to move the block, in line with John Stegeman's 4-4-2 with a wide focus shape.

▶ Watch tactical collision ▶ Stegeman's simulations

This is not a match prediction. It does not mean Unai Emery would win a fixture, has the better squad or is the better manager. It answers one question: if both managers had approximately equal squads, whose style would naturally cause more problems for the other? Results evidence is kept separate from tactical evidence. Past head-to-head records are shaped by squad quality, so the counter score is derived only from build-up, pressing, defensive and transition structures.

Matchup summary

Prototype dataset

Tactical similarity

Unai Emery holds the clearest edge in in-game flexibility (24 points). Unai Emery follows in possession control, which is where the game is most likely to be decided second.

1
In-game flexibility
Touchline changes are a secondary weapon.
Emery +24
2
Possession control
Controlled tempo against balanced tempo.
Emery +23
3
Pressing
Low press against a high press.
Emery +21
4
Build-up
Direct build-up that prioritises territory and second balls vs mixed build-up, baiting the press before switching.
Emery +20
5
Chance creation
4-4-2 with a wide focus shape versus a 4-4-2 mid-block.
Emery +20
6
Transitions
Release the wide players early and compete for the second phase against aggressive offside trap into fast direct breaks.
Emery +19
7
Defensive organisation
Deep line against Unai Emery's attacking model.
Emery +10

Expected phase-by-phase difference

Prototype dataset

John StegemanUnai Emery

In-game flexibility
70 — 94
Possession control
59 — 82
Pressing
63 — 84
Build-up
63 — 83
Chance creation
64 — 84
Transitions
69 — 88
Defensive organisation
78 — 88

Bars show the projected gap in each phase of play. Left of centre favours John Stegeman; right of centre favours Unai Emery.

Tactical matchup highlights

Prototype dataset

Press vs build-up
Unai Emery
John Stegeman's press (63) against Unai Emery's build-up (83) decides whether the first phase survives.
Build-up vs press
Unai Emery
Unai Emery presses at 84; John Stegeman builds at 63.
Attack vs defence
Unai Emery
John Stegeman's attacking model (64) against Unai Emery's defensive organisation (88).
Transition duel
Unai Emery
Both sides live in the seconds after a turnover — 69 vs 88.
In-game flexibility
Unai Emery
Who changes the game from the touchline: 70 vs 94.

Assessment profile

Prototype dataset

John StegemanUnai Emery

John Stegeman — mentality

Prototype dataset

Proactivity
61
How far the team seeks to dictate rather than react.
Risk appetite
61
Willingness to accept exposure in exchange for territory.
Game control
61
Preference for managing tempo and possession.
Pressing aggression
62
Intensity and height of the defensive commitment.
In-game adaptability
70
Frequency and impact of structural changes.
Development focus
68
Weighting given to improving individual players.

Unai Emery — mentality

Prototype dataset

Proactivity
83
How far the team seeks to dictate rather than react.
Risk appetite
87
Willingness to accept exposure in exchange for territory.
Game control
82
Preference for managing tempo and possession.
Pressing aggression
84
Intensity and height of the defensive commitment.
In-game adaptability
94
Frequency and impact of structural changes.
Development focus
82
Weighting given to improving individual players.

Against a common opponent (aggressive high press)

Prototype dataset

Build-up
56
76
Progression
62
83
Chance creation
60
78
Pressing
46
70
Attacking transition
73
90
Defensive transition
55
51

Updated today · Updated this week · Confidence MEDIUM · Source: GafferLens editorial review

MOCK DATA — matchup modelling is derived from provisional editorial ratings and does not represent measured match outcomes.

Prefer the classic side-by-side table? Open in Compare →