Comparison

Compare managers

Select two manager dossiers for professional tactical analysis, read against the same scale.

Prototype rating

Select manager A

🇺🇸

Pat Noonan

FC Cincinnati

United States flag United States

GafferScore 76

Tactical FlexibilityStructured Build-UpCounter Attack

Tactical Flexibility / Structured Build-Up

vs

Select manager B

🇪🇸

Unai Emery

Aston Villa

Spain flag Spain · 54

GafferScore 88

Tactical FlexibilityHigh Defensive LineCounter Attack

Tactical Flexibility / High Defensive Line

Tactical comparison

Comparison summary

Pat Noonan sets up as adaptive • opponent-specific • varied from a 3-4-2-1, pressing at high intensity behind a medium defensive line. Unai Emery is detail-led • offside trap • game management from a 4-4-2, with high press intensity and a very high line.

Key similarities

  • Tempo — both around 62
  • Central Overloads — both around 71
  • Pressing Intensity — both around 80
  • High Press — both around 81

Key differences

  • Line Height — Unai Emery higher by 34
  • Verticality — Unai Emery higher by 29
  • Width — Unai Emery higher by 16
  • GafferScore — Unai Emery higher by 12

Tactical similarity65%

🇺🇸

GafferScore

76/100

Pat Noonan

FC Cincinnati

Major League Soccer

🇪🇸

GafferScore

88/100

Unai Emery

Aston Villa

Premier League

Comparative shape

Assessment profile

AttackDefencePressingPossessionBuild-UpTransitionPlayerTactical
Pat NoonanUnai Emery
0–100 index

Overall

76

GafferScore

88

Advantage Unai Emery

72

Current Form

80

Advantage Unai Emery

0–100 index

Tactical identity

79

Possession

82

Similar

62

Tempo

62

Similar

62

Width

78

Advantage Unai Emery

65

Verticality

94

Advantage Unai Emery

0–100 index

Build-up

78

Short Build-Up

83

Advantage Unai Emery

71

Goalkeeper Involvement

74

Similar

79

Central Progression

83

Advantage Unai Emery

79

Press Resistance

82

Similar

0–100 index

Attack

80

Chance Creation

84

Advantage Unai Emery

80

Final Third Structure

83

Similar

69

Width

80

Advantage Unai Emery

71

Central Overloads

71

Similar

0–100 index

Pressing

80

Pressing Intensity

80

Similar

80

Counter-Press

83

Similar

80

High Press

82

Similar

83

Pressing Triggers

88

Advantage Unai Emery

0–100 index

Defence

82

Defensive Organisation

88

Advantage Unai Emery

58

Line Height

92

Advantage Unai Emery

70

Compactness

64

Advantage Pat Noonan

82

Rest Defence

89

Advantage Unai Emery

0–100 index

Transitions

74

Attacking Transition

80

Advantage Unai Emery

81

Defensive Transition

88

Advantage Unai Emery

0–100 index

Development

77

Youth Development

82

Advantage Unai Emery

79

Player Improvement

84

Advantage Unai Emery

0–100 index

Flexibility

88

Formation Flexibility

94

Advantage Unai Emery

86

In-Game Adaptability

93

Advantage Unai Emery

GafferLens index

Category assessment

80Attack84
82Defence88
80Pressing84
79Possession82
78Build-Up83
79Transition88
77Player Development82
88Tactical Flexibility94
Verified canonical record

Current Club — League

—Matches140
—Win %52.1%
Career-wide profile data

Career profile record

—Points / game1.83
—Goals / game1.86
—Conceded / game1.11
—Clean sheet %38%
3-4-2-1Current base shape4-4-2
—Age54
—Appointed1 NOV 2022
—Tenure3 years, 11 months
—ContractUntil Jun 2029
—Yrs in senior management21 years
FC CincinnatiClubAston Villa
Major League SoccerLeaguePremier League
Projected

Head-to-head tactical matchup

Provisional
  • Press vs build-up

    Advantage: Unai Emery

    Pat Noonan's press (80) against Unai Emery's build-up (83) decides whether the first phase survives.

  • Build-up vs press

    Advantage: Unai Emery

    Unai Emery presses at 84; Pat Noonan builds at 78.

  • Attack vs defence

    Advantage: Unai Emery

    Pat Noonan's attacking model (80) against Unai Emery's defensive organisation (88).

  • Transition duel

    Advantage: Unai Emery

    Both sides live in the seconds after a turnover — 79 vs 88.

  • In-game flexibility

    Advantage: Unai Emery

    Who changes the game from the touchline: 88 vs 94.

Matchup lines are modelled from tactical descriptors, not from recorded fixtures between these managers.

GafferLens Pro

Advanced manager intelligence

Coming later

Advanced Tactical Style

Possession + High PressFast / Vertical + Counter AttackBuild combinations

Build-Up Style

Short Build-UpStructured Build-UpDirect ProgressionGoalkeeper InvolvementBack Three Build-Up

Pressing Profile

High PressCounter-PressMid-BlockLow BlockMan-Oriented Press

Attacking Profile

Positional AttackHigh-Tempo AttackWide OverloadsCentral OverloadsHalf-Space FocusDirect Attacking

Defensive Profile

High Defensive LineCompact BlockAggressive DefenceDeep DefenceDefensive Organisation

Player Development

Youth DevelopmentAcademy IntegrationPlayer ImprovementYoung Squad Experience

Advanced Experience

Champions League ExperienceEuropean ExperienceInternational ManagementTitle-Winning ExperienceRebuild Experience

Rating Filters

GafferScore ≥ 85Pressing ≥ 80Build-Up ≥ 80Player Development ≥ 75

Multi-Filter Search

Possession + High Press + Under 45 + Elite Experience

Manager Match

Build an ideal profile92% Match with explanation

Club Fit Analysis

Which managers best suit a selected club

Advanced Similarity

Build-UpAttackPressingDefenceTransitionsFlexibilityPlayer Development

Available with GafferLens Pro — coming later. These previews are not yet interactive.

Season: 2026/27